dox^2

You Listening McCain?

nobody@vox.com(dox^2) — Tue, 22 Jul 2008 12:17:58 -0600

With speculation that McCain is going to make his pick this week... my vote still goes to Sarah Palin -- "could be a home run."

All of the others seem like the same old song and dance.

Read and post comments | Send to a friend

More Buzz for Palin...

nobody@vox.com(dox^2) — Sun, 13 Jul 2008 17:37:15 -0600

Sarah Palin for Vice President - 2008

Read and post comments | Send to a friend

Obama: The New New Politician

nobody@vox.com(dox^2) — Thu, 10 Jul 2008 08:38:57 -0600

So much for Obama being that new hope and a different kind of politician, ehh?

Wiretapping orders approved by secret orders under the previous version of the surveillance law were set to begin expiring in August unless Congress acted. Heading into their political convention in Denver next month and on to the November Congressional elections, many Democrats were wary of handing the Republicans a potent political weapon.
The issue put Senator Barack Obama, the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee, in a particularly precarious spot. He had long opposed giving legal immunity to the phone companies that took part in the N.S.A.’s wiretapping program, even threatening a filibuster during his run for the nomination. But on Wednesday, he ended up voting for what he called “an improved but imperfect bill” after backing a failed attempt earlier in the day to strip the immunity provision from the bill through an amendment.

I guess you can't vote with your convictions all of the time. So begins an even newer era for Obama -- that of being a true politician -- like the rest of them.

Read and post comments | Send to a friend

Where Are the Adults? Indeed...

nobody@vox.com(dox^2) — Wed, 09 Jul 2008 22:01:32 -0600

I guess we are reaching the herd immunity threshold.

The biggest U.S. outbreak of measles since 1997 has sickened 127 people in 15 states, most of whom were not vaccinated against the highly contagious viral illness, federal health officials said on Wednesday.
The outbreak was driven by travelers who became infected overseas -- 10 countries are implicated -- then returned to the United States ill and infected others, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

It is simple... get your children vaccinated.

Read and post comments | Send to a friend

So Much for That Global Warming Thing...

nobody@vox.com(dox^2) — Wed, 09 Jul 2008 20:51:00 -0600

Like a mouse to a trap with cheese, a committed local climate follower sprung the hyperlink on Drudge today.

The article was out of Australia discussing a case study of a patient who was suffering from depression.

The utter irony of the situation is that the global warming deniers are really anti-science and for them to quote a scientific journal as further basis to prove that this other science is junk is too funny. Especially when the cited study is about psychology. If there is ever a question of modeling and trying to comprehend the unknown -- it is the study of how the mind works. How convenient...

It also tells another story -- extrapolating one event to prove a bigger phenomenon. That of taking a medical case study of a person who is obviously experiencing mental problems and concluding that all people who believe the science of climate change are somehow delusional. That is the antithesis of science.

But the good news in all of this is if we we are willing to accept one side of the spectrum -- those who abnormally interpret how to act with climate change (as described in the journal article) -- then there logically has to be the other side of the spectrum -- those who are stubbornly, unwilling to recognize the scientific advances made in the understanding of how the climate is warming, partially due to humans, and then try to use the guise of rationality to defend their position.

I laugh when I read those who claim that climate science is "anecdotal" or "unproven." Or that running models and tests are about getting the results you want to see. As if the peer-review system would let anyone get away with that!

The mind numbing arrogance about these sorts of thoughts is that this comes from the same people who see only what they want to see; the only difference is that they didn't run a model or a test. They only claim to have made an observation:

It was cold yesterday -- so much for that global warming thing.

Or how about this one:

There was this patient in Australia -- so much for that global warming thing.

Read and post comments | Send to a friend

Yellowcake

nobody@vox.com(dox^2) — Wed, 09 Jul 2008 12:30:08 -0600

While the story about Iraq's yellowcake does not seem to be a very big deal since the UN has known about it following the first Gulf War, it does make me think about Saddam a bit more.

The removal of 550 metric tons of "yellowcake" — the seed material for higher-grade nuclear enrichment — was a significant step toward closing the books on Saddam's nuclear legacy. It also brought relief to U.S. and Iraqi authorities who had worried the cache would reach insurgents or smugglers crossing to Iran to aid its nuclear ambitions.

Even if you don't think about the implications of such a stockpile with Iraq falling into the hands of Iran, think about this:

Would you trust Saddam in 5, 10, 15 years (if we didn't invade) with 550 metric tons of concentrated uranium?

I wonder if he was saving it for his sons and their future regimes? Uday and Qusay?

I wonder if some of that yellowcake went to Syria for their program prior to Israeli attack?

Why didn't the UN remove this over the 10 year post-Gulf war period? Was it too hard? Were they too weak to do so?

The Nigeria yellowcake story it seemed to me was a big deal because of the thoughts and implications of such potential material in Saddam's hands. Why didn't the U.S. push for the removal of all of the material he already had then?

It just reinforces, in my mind, the uselessness of the United Nations when it comes to dealing with aggressive regimes. And it reinforces the uncertainty of what Saddam's intentions were with such material (from when he was originally trying to build nuclear capability back in the early 80s to what he might have done with it in the future).

Read and post comments | Send to a friend

Independence

nobody@vox.com(dox^2) — Fri, 04 Jul 2008 17:34:57 -0600

On this independence day, I can't help but think of the word itself. While we celebrate our separation from British rule in terms of our history, I can't help but ponder our future and my thoughts on the political issues. I find as I get older I tend to let illogical arguments get under my skin more and it starts to push me out of certain ideological nests. In the past, I usually would just accept some issues on the conservative side as being par for the course (e.g., religious right, creationist basis for issues, environmental mockery) no matter how different they were from my thoughts. And while for some it is easy to illogically argue for one issue, while logically defending many others... for me I cannot.

I think, for me, you have to call a spade a spade. When I listen to talk radio and hear an argument defending Bush for something dumb and then turn around a week later and blast a member of the opposite party for the same thing, it just gets under my skin. I for one, cannot live within the constraints of blind ideology, especially when both sides bear problems.

If I were a falling gallon of water, I would find that there isn't just one ideological bucket that would catch me, but a number of them -- where I fill a little in each. A moderate amount in the conservative bucket, some in the liberal bucket, and a little in the libertarian bucket.

It is funny how as we get smarter in terms of science, we find the buckets of classification in biology, for instance, change. No longer is there the kingdom of Monera, but now Bacteria and Archaebacteria. No longer are there separate kingdoms for animals, plants, fungi, etc., but one kingdom Eurkarya (because there are too many instances where organisms blur the lines of previously established classifications). Where there were many kingdoms to separate organisms there is now one and where there was one there are many.

So will political ideology evolve? History says it has and it will continue that is for sure.

I guess for now I am just one guy who is just a political blur. There are those who cannot stand this, but hopefully there are those who don't mind.

Somebody has to be the political platypus. Hopefully there are more. But maybe someday there will be a more defined home for my political beliefs.

Read and post comments | Send to a friend

Hitchens Gets Waterboarded

nobody@vox.com(dox^2) — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 21:46:13 -0600

I have to say I have a great deal of respect for Christopher Hitchens -- mainly for his atheist views and his pro stance on the war on terrorism. And I think he is telling the truth on this matter.

See the video. Read his article.

The “board” is the instrument, not the method. You are not being boarded. You are being watered. This was very rapidly brought home to me when, on top of the hood, which still admitted a few flashes of random and worrying strobe light to my vision, three layers of enveloping towel were added. In this pregnant darkness, head downward, I waited for a while until I abruptly felt a slow cascade of water going up my nose.
[...]
I apply the Abraham Lincoln test for moral casuistry: “If slavery is not wrong, nothing is wrong.” Well, then, if waterboarding does not constitute torture, then there is no such thing as torture.

Read and post comments | Send to a friend

Obama to the Faith-Based Rescue

nobody@vox.com(dox^2) — Tue, 01 Jul 2008 20:48:57 -0600

Good plan. Go with something that the left criticized with GW in the hopes of winning over more of the right. Kind of sounds like a true politician, doesn't it?

Taking a page from President Bush, Democrat Barack Obama said Tuesday he wants to expand White House efforts to steer social service dollars to religious groups, risking protests in his own party with his latest aggressive reach for voters who usually vote Republican.

Gag me with a spoon. I always thought Bush pushing the faith-based program thing was wrong. Now Obama wants to "expand" them.

Funny how atheists can find their vote for Obama because of his speeches that speak of reaching out to non-believers. Yet from my perspective, he isn't changing any policies from his predecessor. He isn't talking about separating church and state by "expanding" these programs. He is talking about using taxpayer money to fund these programs.

Also, all I think about when I read this news piece are all of the liberals who were writing that Obama is a different kind of politician pushing his hope line. This just continues to confirm that he is just a politician like all of them -- looking for votes and walking the line. There is nothing new here.

Balloon. Pop.

Read and post comments | Send to a friend

Hawaii del sol

nobody@vox.com(dox^2) — Tue, 01 Jul 2008 09:27:38 -0600

Looks like Hawaii is making solar mandatory in all new homes.

Hawaii has become the first state to require solar water heaters in new homes. The bill was signed into law by Governor Linda Lingle, a Republican. It requires the energy-saving systems in homes starting in 2010. It prohibits issuing building permits for single-family homes that do not have solar water heaters. Hawaii relies on imported fossil fuels more than any other state, with about 90 percent of its energy sources coming from foreign countries, according to state data.

And a Republican no less.

This may raise the initial price of housing in Hawaii, but it will save the homeowner money over the long term. It is just like any other efficiency investment.

Read and post comments | Send to a friend